If Your Injury Happened at a Florida Park: How an FDACS Report Entry Reads
FDACS publishes the MOU Exempt Facilities Report as a single document, organized by year and quarter, with the most recent quarter first. The version described here shows "Updated: October 15, 2026" and opens its newest section with "3rd Quarter 2026 (July - September 2026)."
Every section of the report repeats the same preamble, word for word:
"The following report is a compilation of data collected from the exempt facilities and reflects only the information reported at the time of the incident. Due to privacy-related concerns, the Department does not receive updates to initial assessments of a patron's condition."
Two phrases in that preamble do a lot of work. "Exempt facilities" refers to the parks whose reports appear in this document; the report itself does not explain the term beyond its title, and it groups entries under each facility's name as printed, such as "Disney World," "Universal," "Sea World," "Busch Gardens" and "Legoland." "Reported at the time of the incident" means each line is a snapshot of what was reported then, not a later account.
Within each quarter, the report lists a facility name and then the entries reported for it, or "None Reported" where there are none. Each entry follows the same short pattern: the date, the name of the attraction, the guest's age and sex in abbreviated form ("yof" for a year-old female, "yom" for a year-old male; older sections spell it out, such as "29 year old male"), and a brief description of what was reported.
Here are three of the newest entries, all listed under "Disney World" in the third quarter of 2026, quoted exactly as printed:
- "7/11/26 Humunga Kowabunga, 25 yof, guest injured right leg while on the attraction"
- "9/1/26 Rock 'n' Rollercoaster Starring the Muppets, 42 yom, guest experienced dizziness and eye pain after riding the attraction"
- "9/23/26 Tiana's Bayou Adventure, 44 yom, guest experienced vomiting after riding the attraction"
Notice how little each line contains. There is no name, no description of how the incident happened, no account of treatment and no follow-up. "While on the attraction" or "after riding the attraction" places the event in time and says nothing about cause. Some entries add context in the park's own words, such as a note of a "pre-existing condition," and that note is likewise what was reported, not a medical finding.
What is at stake for a family here is recognition: a line in this report may be the only public, official trace of the day. The useful questions are simple ones. Does a date, an attraction and a guest description line up with what happened? If a line seems to match, what exactly does it say, and what does it leave out? The site's page on Florida theme park injury law covers how Florida's own law treats these cases, and the page on Disney theme park injuries discusses the report as it relates to that resort.
If no matching line appears, that absence is not proof that nothing happened. The report reflects what facilities reported, in the form they reported it.